|
|
|
|
|
by palmotea
31 days ago
|
|
> Would you also say that "someone who wants to use an IDE / LSP features to code and not give credit to the IDE / LSP is the worst kind of person"? That's a false equivalency. > If not, what is the difference between the two for you? Let's start this out right: if they're equivalent, first you explain to us why you think so. |
|
How is it false?
> Let's start this out right: if they're equivalent, first you explain to us why you think so.
I think it should be really obvious how they're equivalent: both are the result of a program running on a computer, and not the result of in-the-moment cognition by a moral agent or moral patient. Of course the LLM is just a tool. Models can literally be downloaded as ordinary files. There is not some threshold to cross where some configurations of bits on a disk deserve "credit" for work and others do not.