Says HN a thousand times on articles that are older than LLMs. I'm not saying this article is or isn't AI, what I am saying is that randos on HN saying something is AI with any definitive certainty hasn't been a great bet. All you do it does is add noise to the conversation.
Agreed, a lot of noise, but for actual data, all of the research into stylometry is also available to LLM vendors, and chasing that target is a major issue in academia and publishing.
So the pushback on the pushback on slop is also noise.
Says HN a thousand times on articles that are older than LLMs. I'm not saying this article is or isn't AI, what I am saying is that randos on HN saying something is AI with any definitive certainty hasn't been a great bet. All you do it does is add noise to the conversation.