[paintbox]

For comparison allow me to add chatGPT 5.5:

"Choose U-235 if the goal is safe, boring, practical electricity generation. Choose Pu-241 only if the goal is specifically to consume/recycle plutonium in a reactor designed and licensed for that fuel.

In brutal shorthand: Pu-241 is a better “fissile isotope” in some nuclear-physics ways, but U-235 is a much better reactor fuel in the real world."

If only I knew anything about nuclear reactors. But it sounds to me that the answer is also correct.

[thecopy]

Am i the only one feeling my soul being emptied every time i read another "brutal shorthand" or "honest take"?

[dbuxton]

It's genuinely depressing.

[smallmancontrov]

Yeah, but the default is extreme yap mode. I prefer "in a sentence" or "rows, not paragraphs." "Brutal" sounds like bait from an influencer trying to sell me a $400 course about how 4AM workouts will make me a millionaire.

[jdiff]

I don't even know how we got here. This isn't that deeply represented in the training data. Is this what RLHF hath wrought? A new dialect of English based on corporatespeak and influencers, two heavy-hitting bullshitters?

[ChucklsTheBeard]

Remember how, for SEO purposes, every food blog has to bs a multi-page story that everyone scrolls past to get to the 10 line recipe?

That's training data too; that's how we got here.

[beiburg]

It’s not only for that. The story provide them the copyright protection since recipes are not copyrighted