|
|
|
|
|
by roenxi
29 days ago
|
|
> Cost is not only relevant, it's paramount. Efficiency is only important insofar as it affects overall cost. Oh sorry, I thought you were talking about efficiency. Ok, what is the cost is for these plants? > A single full time employee, like a security guard, will cost a good chunk of that. I dunno, a 1MW nuclear plant could end up being pretty small. It might easily be economic to install them places that already have security guards. |
|
All of these reactors were built in the early 1960's and the last (MH-1A) was retired in 1978. All of them were operated in places that had lots of soldiers around (though McMurdo and Camp Century relied more on being really difficult to get to than actual sentries) And they were never replaced. Because even having guards already paid for didn't help the economics of the situation. Maybe things are different now. But I've yet to see any evidence for it.