| You sound exactly like a preacher. No math, no science. Seriously, read the thread. Look how hard it is to get people that claim to be on the side of science to do any science! Just do a little math. Yet you'll tell scientists to their face they are wrong. A bunch of people who maybe have a degree in marketing giving political opinion as medical advice. >nor does the consensus of qualified medical practitioners According to who? Where did you get this from? Aren't you embarrassed to admit that you got it from a media outlet and you've found no such meta study to cite? According to the consensus, as it appears from the huge amount of research on the topic, COVID RNA treatments exhibit a much higher rate of negative outcomes than traditional vaccines and a higher rate than COVID infection, which mostly goes undetected and causes no symptoms. That's in line with CDC data, and it's according to the CDC statements about the vaccine as well. The CDC / FDA never made any statements about this treatment being safer than getting COVID for a healthy child or adult as individuals. The purpose of recommending that the risk of treatment was necessary, is for the protection of those with weakened immune systems through herd immunity. For the public good, essentially. Everything I've said here is backed by the FDA and CDC websites, and you can very easily confirm it. Please do so. You WANT to be on the side of science, and I love that, but it looks to me like you are on the side of a media conglomerate instead. They've told you that they are the arbiter of science, and you believe them. You're in a cult, in other words. |