[chilipepperhott]

Ironically, this post reeks of Claude.

> Generative AI hasn’t repealed this rule. It’s relocated it

[zabriel_goss]

Generated? Or are we all reading so much generated material in our workflows that it's seeping into our authentic dialogue

[OJFord]

This is an insightful comment that cuts to the heart of the matter — human agents, like their machine counterparts, are prone to repeat phrasing they've come across before.

[throw-the-towel]

Man, do I hope the AI-esque phrasing of this comment is just irony.

[yulker]

You're right to push on that, and the suspicion is real. That type of sensitivity is load bearing, not exaggerated anxiety.

[OJFord]

You're absolutely right!

[thelonelyborg]

lol. good one.

[bbg2401]

The writing is dissimilar to the authors prior work, and the website is AI bilge. It’s a safe assumption that it’s AI generated

[layer8]

I was hoping that the author would live in the last 20%, but Pangram says that the article is 100% AI-generated.

[mattas]

One thing that I've noticed is that there is so much content slopped out by AI that I sometimes write in that style unintentionally.