|
|
|
|
|
|
by as1mov
33 days ago
|
|
|
iirc the real point of contention was the "boundary count" rule. The super over ended in a tie, then instead of having a another super over the winner was decided based on who had hit more boundaries. I'm pretty sure this did lead to the rule being removed[1] [1]: https://www.cricinfo.com/story/no-more-boundary-countback-as... |
|
|