|
|
|
|
|
by lucfranken
29 days ago
|
|
Totally agree on that, if you have to look constantly at something 95% there is no value. The expectation of course is that it will be better. But if not at a certain level useless. Not sure how that research compares to the claims being made by many that a second opinion via ai in the end led to changes in treatment. Likely people spent quite some time searching and figuring out. That would be a different and n=1 result. Don't have enough knowledge of that research to determine how much result can be gained when the models are managed in a way that produces better results. And of course how much time/effort/cost that would take. How much is custom and how much is an automated programmable flow. |
|