| > So you're also implicitly ignoring solution 6, which a lot of people elsewhere in this thread are arguing for, which is parents using existing parental control systems built into their devices, which work 100% client side? I'm 100% fine with those, but people report that they're "insufficient" for vague reasons. That's why I suggest we beef them up. Also... > Why? Parental controls at the moment are patchy, poorly understood and certainly don't operate in the way you're proposing they should in future. you seem to agree with the reports I'm hearing. That's why I suggest beefing them up. > The part that I quoted? That would be quite a feat. One that you managed, somehow. Gratz. > ...they dismiss the entire thing as a conspiracy Unless you're using the "Two or more people get together to plan something" definition of the word "conspiracy" -which happens to neatly cover planning to go to lunch-, I don't consider this to be a conspiracy. [0] > There are more than three options here. I was only discussing three, and I'm sure we can come up with way more than five in total, but sure, let's go. > 4. Service providers make an informed guess... That's happening now and has been for a while now. We all see how willing the larger operators are to rely on their guesses rather than relying on the judgment of a third-party. Having said that... when last I checked, 4chan was one of the operators who are doing the noble thing in the face of all this hysteria. [1] It sure is something when 4chan is on the right side of an issue and the big guys aren't. > 5. Anonymous credentials systems... They're absolutely not going to be anonymous in practice. As I mentioned earlier: ...the private company that is contracted to implement and run a server-side implementation will cut every corner to improve their profit margins.
> That's age verification of a sort by the guardian...Absolutely not. Do explain where the restricted account has either its age, documents that contain its user's age, or documents that can be used to look up its user's age entered into it. A helpful hint is to ask yourself how you'd distinguish between the content restrictions set for a precocious eleven-year-old and those set for an adult suffering from both PTSD and advanced dementia who needs to be protected from both scammers and graphic depictions of sex and violence. [0] Yes, I read ahead to the end of the sentence I quoted. The statement to which this footnote is attached is included for completeness' sake. [1] <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c624330lg1ko> |