Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tetris11 30 days ago
I feel like people on HN who have comfortable passive incomes from stocks or other sources forget that people need a paycheck to sustain their lifestyles.
5 comments

I very much depend on my pay check to sustain my life in the long run, although worker protections and a small (!) nest egg make it so I wouldn’t have to put up with this kind of abuse. I see employment as an agreement for a set number of hours of my expertise in exchange for a fee. End of transaction.

The real world is slightly less black and white of course, but that’s the gist of it.

But if $DAYJOB actually keeps you from your dying kid's bedside, is it still there to "sustain" it? Or is it just leeching into your life?
If having a job is still marginally better than not having it, it's a sign of an efficient labor market.

(Market inefficiencies is where everything that is nice, beautiful, good, human, lives.)

Why do you write '$DAYJOB'?
General nerd slang for "fill in the name of it here" based on coding syntax

so like imagine your day jobs employers name in that part

Many of us live in countries with work legislation that disallowes this kind of management.
I'm told that's communism
Yeah,na common message among late stage capitalists.
It seems the poster was aware of that

"That's what I would've been thinking in the shower 2 days after the conversation, anyway."

You can always find another job, even if it's worse than your current one. A prick who thinks my family is less important than a transportation project, and has the audacity to assert that to me, can do the project himself or in the company of spineless worms.
I'd take a mid-2000's Boeing engineer's salary for an asshole boss. Hell, I've been told worse here on HN.