[cadamsdotcom]

> An LLM's primary modality isn't smell. It's... text. But, specifically: text in the context of a user-assistant conversation in which it's trying to be helpful. Text is how they learned about everything they know, and the user-assistant chatlog is how they communicate everything they generate

This is true for instruction-tuned models; but instruction tuning is late in the training process.

A bit like assessing a person’s self-awareness based on their high-school knowledge.

[thepasch]

Very true, and something worth mentioning. Papers that tried eliciting introspective language from base models with no post-training have largely failed to find any patterns or activations that look similar to those found in instruct models when prompted for the same thing. I did sort of touch on it in the "what does this mean" section:

> *post-training* installs a self-model with actual, meaningful boundaries, and when processing falls outside those boundaries, the first-person pronoun no longer binds to the content.

But you're right I could've been more explicit about it.

[cadamsdotcom]

Yep. Self-awareness is only useful for embodied organisms that exist in a social context.

Detection of errors injected into context is useful but I think it’s a different thing.