[lostlogin]

‘Makes up’ is inaccurate for sure. But it’s not strictly true to call it acquired data either.

After years of collecting artifacts and errors, I have more and more respect for the tool.

But it’s jarring. I open a sequence, decrease the acquired resolution, add the AI and get a scan that’s quicker and higher resolution.

It’s an amazing time to be an MR tech.

[uecker]

It is amazing. It is the result of two decades of research in image reconstruction algorithms. The machine learning is part of it, but that it is sold as "AI" has probably more to do with marketing.

[fluidcruft]

I haven't seen it marketed as "AI" by GE, Siemens or Philips. They usually gesture at "deep learning" or "compressed sensing".

No radiologist is buying "AI" scanners. Radiologists are probably among the most jaded of an audience about the word "AI" due to decades of undelivered promises. AI is synonymous with "worthless trash" to them, not to mention everyone says "AI" is going to put them out of work. lol

[lostlogin]

It certainly has a lot of marketing behind it.

https://marketing.webassets.siemens-healthineers.com/2861d15...