Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by corndoge 2 hours ago
Often times the words produced do have legitimate factual information though. It's less psychosis and more a confluence of well known human tendencies - salience bias, automation bias, etc.
1 comments

The big problem is often times they don't as well. That's why we can't rely on them.
Same with humans? Doctors, scientists...if a tool has any error rate above zero its not reliable?