|
|
|
|
|
by rich_sasha
30 days ago
|
|
Right - but means of production can't be created and destroyed from nothing. Proper centrally planned economies all thought it could and failed. China is much more free at moving them from one place to another, in particular allocating them differently to the hedonistic preferences of their citizens. But it's still only moving not creating. For now it seems, the thing that needs to give is the workers' consumption. What else? No idea. |
|
But they are not the only way, you can go back to a more autarkical model for the rural population, or to a more directed economy like during WW2, or a mix of both. Also, if i want to be exact, i don't think China is totally capitalist yet anyway, you still have rural villages that does not allocate all resources through the market.