[tudelo]

> For a significantly shorter critque of the book, check out qntm's critique. I mostly agree with qntm assessment. But it's a bit too emotional and personal and doesn't cover the parts i find the most harmful.

This page seems like an actual critique while the blog post doesn't offer much of one, am I missing something?

edit: There is a github linked towards the bottom of the post... full of LLM emoji exclamations.

We deserve better

[bmacho]

> This page seems like an actual critique while the blog post doesn't offer much of one, am I missing something?

I meant to submit <https://bugzmanov.github.io/cleancode-critique/clean_code_se...>, but HN mangled the URL. I've messaged the mods about it.

> am I missing something?

There is a menu on the left with some more content. I'd say the discoverability of it is bad, since there are many chapters, and only a few has meaningful content. A single page view would solve this issue.

[dang]

HN uses the canonical URL when it finds one and that was https://bugzmanov.github.io/cleancode-critique/ in this case. Fixed now!