|
|
|
|
|
by pfdietz
13 hours ago
|
|
> It's also a MASSIVE amount of SUPER TEDIOUS work. It was, but now autoformalization is a thing. If he had delivered his proof and a formalization -- no matter how much it looked like autogenerated slop -- he would have been taken much more seriously. Despite reluctance to do formalization, I expect it will gradually become required to get math published, since journals will be flooded with AI generated slop. It will be necessary to filter the slop, and requirement of formalization in the supplementary material would be a good way to do that. It would still be necessary to check that the formalization of the statement of the theorem is correct, but that's a much smaller ask. |
|