|
|
|
|
|
|
by ChuckMcM
31 days ago
|
|
|
Looks like someone is running one of the LLM models and publishing the results. It looks that way because there is a really wide mix from things that are silly "replace system binaries to run arbitrary code!" to things that could be legit. That is kind of par for the course when you ask an LLM to 'find an exploit and write a PoC' kind of prompt. Presumably if you train something on the last 15 years of Metasploit[1] reports it can find the same bugs that people have written into new code. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metasploit |
|
|