[cassianoleal]

> various restrictions like only showing it within your personal home

Are you implying that lending the disc to a friend so they can watch in their own home is forbidden? Or taking the disc to the friend's place to watch together?

[wilg]

No, those aren't the restrictions. But there are restrictions. First-sale doctrine allows lending. But you are not allowed to play the movie in, say, a restaurant, theater, or other public place.

[cassianoleal]

That's fine, but that's very different from what the post to which I was responding said.

[geor9e]

Ya got me. You can also show it in your friend's personal home.

[cassianoleal]

I understand your snark, but my I wasn't attempting to be pedantic for the sake of it.

Your original message said "buying a disc is a license to view the intellectual property, subject to various restrictions like only showing it within your personal home". This biases the interpretation towards more restrictions than rights, but I don't think that's the case at all. The restrictions are essentially - don't make money out of playing it, don't play it in public. Pretty much anything else goes.

Call all your friends and family to watch with you whenever you want. Lend to your friends. Take it to your friend's house to watch together. Sell it to someone else. Watch it as many times as you want, anywhere and with anyone you want - as long as those restrictions above are respected, which isn't hard to do.

Do I think this is ideal? No, maybe not - but that's the world we live in, and all things considered, that's still substantially more rights than most "digital ownerships" give you.