|
|
|
|
|
|
by reaperducer
1 hour ago
|
|
|
Is that emitted power, consumed power, or effective radiated power? Without knowing that, your power calculations have no meaning. Radio stations are usually measured by the last of those: Effective radiated power. You can have a radio station with a 50,000 watt ERP, but running only a 2,500 watt transmitter. For FM radio stations, it's all about the height of the transmitter above average terrain. For AM, it's about the ground conductivity and frequency. I once worked at a 1,000-watt AM station that had a signal much larger and clearer signal than the 5,000-watt AM station a few miles away. I'm not a radio engineer, but I'm sure there are plenty on HN who can correct and clarify what I've written. |
|
|
My suspicion is that this means an exciter and a stack of amps per service, which then go through a two stage combiner and out to the antenna. There might even be a pair of exciters and amps per service depending on redundancy.
The combiners (certainly for FM/DAB/TV services) also cause cumulative attenuation as the signal gets combined each time, so even if all 3 are radiating at the same power, the first in the chain might need twice as much amplification to make up for losses.
edit: MB21 (of course) has some fantastic technical info about Droitwitch: https://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=1454&page... and there's some great pics here, too: https://www.radiorewind.co.uk/radio1/droitwich.htm
I believe they're still using a pair of Marconi B6042 transmitters (250kW each, in parallel) to provide at least one of the services.