[gpm]

From the wikipedia article linked above...

> In 2026 ÖP party leader Markus Allard sparked controversy on several occasions. In a debate hosted by Studio3 with Liberal member of parliament Martin Melin, Allard asked: "why won't the Liberals push for deporting 100 000 social welfare-Somalis?" and in the same debate said that "Sweden belongs to the Swedes. We have to make sure that we take care of our own damn people and we must deport these damn parasites who sit and live at our expense."

[anonym29]

"ethnic cleansing" is an emotionally charged term that conjures genocide in the popular imagination. It is not a good descriptive term for what can rightly be described as regressive or ultra-nationalistic migration policy.

[10xDev]

You are essentially calling for a civil war. Reason why Russia pushes these ideas under fake "patriot" accounts.

[ShinyLeftPad]

Would it be a civil war if it was a law passed by elected government?

[axus]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Confederat...

[ShinyLeftPad]

Wasn't that secession? If part of Sweden decides to separate then we could discuss it in that context I guess.

[teh64]

This is the definition from wikipedia: "Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous."

How does what Allard said not fit this definition?

[gpm]

Ethnic cleansing is an emotionally charged term, yes, because the crime against of humanity of deporting an entire population is absolutely horrific and a very close neighbour to genocide.

The proposed policy here is squarely what Rome Statute, Article 7 (1)(d) is intended to prevent. Sweden is a party to the treaty.