|
|
|
|
|
|
by mdp2021
36 days ago
|
|
|
> It's just not even worth arguing this point Pretty simply: the von Neumann architecture separates data storage and processing; we are now researching the alternatives - in all their forms, whatever allows to make NNs efficient; those alternatives basically focus on reducing the distance between stored data and its processing; some simply call stored data "memory"; we had the concept of "Compute in Memory" available; now some are calling "CIM" all of the relevant solutions that allow processing in the vicinity of the storage. It is not the traditional CIM with the ALUs. Too bad. We can easily get the difference. |
|
|