|
|
|
|
|
|
by chimprich
1 hour ago
|
|
|
> That's absolutely not true. The standard for new vaccines, iirc, required a period of something on the order of 7 years. I'm going to stop you there. "That's absolutely not true" versus "iirc". You're making a vehement argument based on remembered nonsense. There was no such requirement. And if there was, then you should have no problem citing it. > I could go off forever on this topic Please don't. > The amount of obfuscation and gaslighting Such irony. |
|
|