Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by selfmodruntime 2 hours ago
> They went through the full regulatory procedures.

This is a non-argument if you decide to adjust regulatory procedures for that one case.

1 comments

If you read the article, you'll see that they did in fact meet the full requirements by August 2021. The EAU plus criteria were met quickly, but they did meet every criteria normally used.
All the doctors and medical professionals were forced to get vaccinated in early 2021. If something went wrong, the very people that we depend on could have suffered mass casualties. And many of them did suffer from effects from the vaccine, even though they likely had already contracted COVID beforehand and a vaccine was unnecessary. This is the problem with mandates and anti-science thinking.
>many of them did suffer from effects from the vaccine

what does many in this sentence mean? are you claiming that a large percent of health professionals "suffered effects"?