| In 1987 a supernova was observed in the sky. In a great coincidence, just months after being put into operation, a new type of detector meant to study if protons are stable, detected instead the neutrinos coming from the supernova in a way that could be individually timestamped. No other supernova has been visible with the naked eye ever since, or is likely to be seen in our lifetimes. https://sci-hub.st/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1494 The neutrinos arrived 3 hours before the supernova was first seen in the sky. This could mean that neutrinos travel faster than light: that they negative mass. It has not been ruled out yet, but it would take extraordinary evidence for any physicist to admit to a faster-than-light particle. The core of supernovae are predicted to take around 4 seconds to explode, and during that time they release 99% of the energy that was binding the star together as neutrinos. Once this has happened, however, it takes several hours for the explosion to be visible outside. If they had 0 mass, you'd expect the burst of neutrinos to last for about 4 seconds. The detected spread was of around 6 seconds. It was likely that the model for supernovae was missing something. But perhaps neutrinos are slowed down as they interact with other particles on the way here from the supernova. Massless particles always travel at the speed of light, only massive particles can be slowed down. Perhaps neutrinos have mass. In order to test the basic theory of nuclear fusion in stars, the "Homestake experiment" was set up to count neutrinos from the Sun. https://sci-hub.st/10.1126/science.191.4224.264 The experiment consists of a big tank of perchloroethylene. Electron neutrinos (and only electron neutrinos) are expected to collide with the Cl-37 atoms to form Ar-37 in the reverse reaction to that of radioactive beta decay. Then the individual Ar-37 atoms can be separated into a gas and counted. According to the brightness of the Sun, it was expected that around 50 such Ar-37 atoms would be detected every 100 days. Only 17 were observerd, on average. A third of the neutrinos went missing. A new round of experiments was made, culminating in the fantastically sophisticated Super-Kamiokande, which is sentitive to all other "flavours" of neutrinos, and also capable of detecting the direction they are coming from. https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ex/9807003 It was confirmed that the missing 2/3 of the electron neutrinos expected to come from the Sun had somehow transformed into the other flavours. What's more, muon neutrinos coming from cosmic ray decay in the atmosphere were detected half as frequently in an upwards direction, coming from the other side of the Earth, than in the downwards direction. The conclusion is that neutrinos must change flavour as they move through space. Particle accelerators were built in several sites, pointing towards the Super-Kamiokande across the earth's crust, sending a beam of neutrinos of a known kind to measure this "oscillation". https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ex/0606032 Since they have mass, the artificial neutrinos are slightly dispersed by their passage through the Earth's crust. Their arrival time forms three different overlapping peaks, corresponding to three different masses. The proportion of each kind changes along the path in a sinusoidal fashion, but the mass peaks remain. The current interpretation is that the mass and the flavour of neutrinos are (almost) "conjugate" properties of the particles, in a similar way to the well-known uncertainty between position and momentum, or between time and frequency in Fourier analysis. As a neutrino moves through space, its mass can be measured more and more accurately from the dispersion in arrival times. The better we know the mass of the particle, the more uncertain we are of its flavour. If because of the great distances the mass is well known, as is the case with the solar neutrinos, then the three flavours are almost completely entangled. On short distances the flavour is well determined but the masses are uncertain. |