|
|
|
|
|
by tstactplsignore
37 days ago
|
|
This article is about MD doctors, not scientists (although there may be some MD-PhDs in it, and yes MDs can get research positions). MD doctors poll at extraordinarily high levels of trust, over almost any other professional group in the United States. So it really isn't correct to directly link this article's topic to "distrust". The effect you're talking about may exist in science, but this article is essentially a counter example to the effect you propose: clinicians publishing bullshit, but retain a high level of public trust. Especially because the article is basically entirely quoting practicing scientists who identified this problem in the first place! More real scientific training or collaborating for clinicians who want to (or have to) do research could potentially improve the situation. |
|
"1966–2012: Historical Harris Polls show a steady long-term erosion, with "great confidence" in the leaders of medicine dropping from 73% to 34% over these decades."
"2021–2024: According to Gallup data, the perceived "honesty and ethics" of doctors fell 14 points, dropping to 53%—the lowest seen since the mid-1990s."
"2024–Present: Major Johns Hopkins University / JAMA Network Open research highlights an overall institutional drop from 71.5% in April 2020 down to 40.1% across socioeconomic groups"