[nougati]

The decision to audit (frankly, aggressively) this guy out the gate with this comment on a discussion thread is not a good look. It's a very unnecessary way to tarnish the reputation of the devs by picking fights with someone sharing their experience. If you can't see how you did that, perhaps you should ask an LLM to help.

[spider-mario]

Why should the parent comment be immune from factual challenges? Reports of personal experience are not sacred.

[nougati]

Learn to pick your fights? People can check the history of the git issues if they want to see. The dev clearly had a bone to pick

[qup]

I think it's really neutral in tone and I appreciate the record being corrected.

2 days is a great turnaround time for PRs isn't it?

[nougati]

With how the record is so correct now, can you clarify for me who was right?

It's the wrong question; the first person was sharing their experience, and the reply jumped to collecting evidence that only vindicated the characterisation of a 'chilly response'. It's a human social skills thing. This place is not github issues. People who actually care will see. People who 'clarify' it here were never maintainers