|
|
|
|
|
by kelnos
1 hour ago
|
|
> this is not really relevant to the point, but to satisfy your curiosity: more than one, and one. What? That's not only relevant to the point, it's incredibly relevant. If the NSA is only able to recruit 2% of the math PhDs they approach, then that's important information. "More than one" is not particularly useful; you seem to be dodging the question because it undermines your argument. |
|
telling you exactly how many people i know in the NSA is also not particularly useful. i'm one guy. there is no statistically significant information from my answer.
>you seem to be dodging the question because it undermines your argument.
my "argument" is that there are plenty of smart people in the NSA. that's it. i am confused why that is seemingly so offensive to you that you had to reply twice.