Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vintermann 2 hours ago
It's back to the question of how much you should give the benefit of doubt to powerful people who openly lie.
1 comments

It's just not technically feasible, so there's nothing to lie about. They're not MITMing petabytes/sec across dozens (hundreds?) of companies and they haven't broken TLS1.3.

If I have a box at Digital Ocean and I'm communicating with it with TLS1.3 using a Let's Encrypt cert that I generated, where, exactly, does this magical MITM box come into play?

Of course it's feasible, you just intercept the traffic post-decryption on the cloud/server side. You don't control how/where your traffic to 3p cloud services is decrypted.
You keep saying this, but it's nonsensical. If I terminate TLS on the box that does processing, there's nothing to intercept.

And these days (especially post-Snowden), many (most?) companies encrypt data when sending between servers within their own (private network) infrastructure.

That "box" is a virtual machine, no?

Do you know what hypervisor is managing it? :)

... not your machines, not your crypto...