Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by klodolph 34 days ago
Unfortunately they seem to be useful, if for no other reason than parents want to take picture of their children at a moment’s notice. AFAIK this is the killer app for these glasses.
3 comments

They’re really very poor at this, the cameras are about what you’d get in a flip phone and are cropped vertical. I was expecting GoPro quality of capture but it’s a very limited field of view left to right and soft focus.

And that’s besides the point of psychological outcomes for the child of a parent always intermediating eye contact with eye-of-meta contact, like it’s one thing to be out in public and see someone who might be streaming, but growing up with the expectation that any action, any expression you give in a parents direction may be captured and played back? Awful.

Maybe for the dozens of people who are actually recording their feats of extreme sports the new oakleys are a good product market fit.

OTOH the audio experience was surprisingly good and if they made a pair without cameras I would buy them.

So many photos taken these days that are never going to be seen.
I wonder if it's still a good thing to have taken the picture. There's something to be said for pausing and having the conscious thought "this is a nice moment". (though of course, moderation in all things)
Whatever AI the feds buy will see them.
I feel like even that scenario is far-fetched. Was Computer cost so high any department trying to analyze data at this national scale is going to go bankrupt.
if only there was a place to share them, and that place actually showed them to the people who indicated that they wanted to see them.
The killer apps for these glasses is creepshots, and everybody knows it. Everything else is just an insincere justification.