|
|
|
|
|
by godelski
39 days ago
|
|
Last time I saw one of these conversations on HN that was the key question. What people disagreed on was what's good, or what's even good enough. I don't think that's a new thing but it's becoming far more apparent in the age of AI. I'll make the claim, a demo is easy to make. But it's far from a minimum viable product. A demo is *maybe* 10% of the work. But for some people I know (and work with) they act like it's 90%. |
|