|
|
|
|
|
by simianwords
3 days ago
|
|
Its very interesting how you are contradicting the whole article's axioms and then arriving at the same conclusion that we are in for a crash! Rational takeaway is to step back and analyse what's really happening here. - Are we really in for a crash? - What does it say about the culture and people's mental models that we have two radically opposing viewpoints on AI costs and people still arrive at same conclusion? |
|
>- Are we really in for a crash?
The question you should really be asking is, is AI really overvalued, or is it so useful it justifies all the hype that surrounds it? If the former, then yes, a crash is inevitable, because we don't live in the land of make-believe. If a crash never happens then AI was not overvalued, it was valued appropriately.