|
|
|
|
|
by Kiboneu
1 hour ago
|
|
> WASM has strong tried and proven sandboxing. We basically can build on nearly 30 years of experience. The decoders don't need a lot of access, they can basically be pure functions. I've heard that kind of sentiment many times before. It's not a good (thought-terminating) mindset to have for any secure software. There are several WASM implementations, WASM is just a format. "Pure functions" are pure at a superficial level. Many people say that they don't mutate global state, but they do ... it's just hidden. The decoders "not needing a lot of access" doesn't matter if the WASM engine is pwned through arbitrary code execution inside the environment, or if it's contorted to bypass the access control you are mentioning through various side-effects. |
|