|
|
|
|
|
|
by bayindirh
2 hours ago
|
|
|
That's not my premise, and not my conclusion. This is a summary of what the admins talk on that discussion page. So I'm just a messenger summarizing things. Moreover, Wikipedia is not a democracy [0]. It's a consensus based system. So, as they say, votes coming from outside doesn't count, and that's fine by me. Last but not the least, this is a kind of decision on the level of law-making for the Wikipedia. People elect politicians, but don't write the laws themselves. Criticizing Wikipedia for not allowing "ordinary citizens" to write the laws is a bit stretch while giving democracy as an example to aspire to doesn't make sense, because even a democracy doesn't work the way you want to portray here. Anyway, Wikipedia is not a democracy to begin with, so that's moot in a sense. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_no... |
|
|