[re-thc]

> How does Anthropic or OpenAI differentiate between the two?

So if they can't why do some companies still get access today? Just 1s much bigger than "us".

It's the equivalent of saying a company like Amazon or Cloudflare should block access to web hosting or "illegal hosting". The argument back then was they aren't gatekeepers? But now they are?

[pixl97]

This is really odd taking two completely different things and trying to apply law against them. Hosting was somewhat protected by previous rulings, selling AI services is not.

[re-thc]

> This is really odd taking two completely different things and trying to apply law against them. Hosting was somewhat protected by previous rulings, selling AI services is not.

What's different? What's not protected? And what's "hosting"? Where do you draw the line with "managed services"?

So if you use "AI" to hack a computer it is different to using "hosting" to put "illegal content"?

Are you implying 1 of them is legal? But both are for the judge to decide.

OR if this is about the provider -- who's selling AI services? It's LLM. Just running software on GPUs. There's no AI. There, done. Same.