|
|
|
|
|
by topham
2 hours ago
|
|
Fixing GET would be easier. And yes,it would be fixing a flawed interpretation of what should be implemented.you are, by definition GETting something. Tools dropping body from GET by default are violating the spec today. Rules configured to drop it are just that, temporarily configured constraints readily modified. Adding QUERY will make it unpredictable in effectively the same manner as GET/body. It'll take even longer to resolve it though. |
|
I disagree. I think the adoption (or dismissal) of QUERY will show.
First thing that comes to mind is that the idempotency of GET resources are easy to handle. URL's have a fixed size, they can be efficiently hashed, cached and are unambiguous about how they serve this purpose.
It is unclear how the ecosystem will deal with the QUERY requirements. It's easy for apps, but browsers, http caches and servers will take some time to figure out solutions.
Fixing GET would have the same amount of uncertainty in addition to the need to keep current expectations valid. It's not easier, it's harder.