[getpokedagain]

I like the topic and I think orgs are struggling with the question:

What do our teams look like now?

But I have some big concerns with your approach here. This post is written like an authoritative summary but you admit it's not been seen working. Why is there so much untested conjecture presented as best practice here? If you had tested it you would realize this proposal is not possible in most orgs. Their "platform" will not be extensive enough to prevent misshaps by teams comprised of non engineers.

[owulveryck]

Because as a consultant I see that this model (TT) is a proven solution to the problems of cognitive load that prevent models to scale. It will require some adaptations indeed, but I trust that this is a missing piece in the integration of AI in organisations. But I get your point and this is the reason it share it on a personal blog and not on my company blog or in a more trustworthy source of truth.

[getpokedagain]

Please take my comments as friendly suggestions in your pull request. I am not intending to shoot you down friend.

I don't think you should avoid sharing it in any forum. Like I said it seems like a reasonable idea but I would just suggest being very I suppose blunt in 2026 because people skim and won't read things thoroughly. I would preface the article with "this is not battle tested"

Lest someone be frustrated when their stream aligned team accidentally exposes your whole company's email addresses on their new web app that whoops they forgot put it behind a login.

[owulveryck]

And thank you for your comment, no offense taken. I post here to get valuable feedback like yours.