[nilirl]

The 'reading effort : meaning' ratio of this post is a bit painful.

There are about 3 named concepts in every paragraph.

There are about 15 claims about named concept being the solution to a problem that's never explained.

At some point, if you try to make 20 different points, you make no point at all.

[mathgeek]

It's got all the indicators of being AI generated, so really not surprising at all. I lost track of how many "this, not that" and "this, but also" within a few paragraphs. LLMs tend to prefer sounding clever over simple terminology.

[owulveryck]

Thank you for the feedback. I actually use AI as a ghost writer, but I am guilty: I usually tend to add too many concepts for a single article (even without AI).

I usually follow Divio’s documentation to reference explanations and references, but it is not suitable for a blog post

[beej71]

> I actually use AI as a ghost writer

With all due respect, it shows. You have the ability to write way better than this.

I was halfway through and thought to myself, "Why is this so fucking hard to understand the author's point?"

The subject sounds extremely timely and important and is something HN readers really crave, but the rambling article just isn't doing it justice.