[frankacter]

>No one commenting on the fact that oAI is releasing a Claude Mythos-class model - with apparent 0 restrictions or concerns by the US government

We don't know that it is Mythos level, it could very well be at (guardrailed) Fable or below.

This is not a wide open distribution, this is only being provided to hand picked partners, similar to how Mythos was distributed (unlike Fable which had wider distribution)

The larger question, which I don't see an answer to in this post:

1) was this tested and validated by the US Government?

2) is the list of partners vetted by the US Government?

If This is "mythos-class" AND

   OpenAI approves SK Telecom as a trusted partner ( https://www.wired.com/story/sk-telecom-anthropic-mythos-export-controls/ ) 

OR

   OpenAI did not get approval.

will this be shut down as quick? Otherwise, it is not really a comparable scenario.

[arcanemachiner]

Isn't Fable just Mythos + prompt guardrails?

[TideAd]

The guardrails i.e. the classifier would also fire on Fable's output and even Fable's internals (i.e. prior to the shutdown people would see it firing when Fable got angry)

https://x.com/repligate/status/2069150509978489287

[frankacter]

Yes, limiting the full scope of capabilities, which is why I differentiated between Mythos (unrestricted) from guardrailed.

Main point being, we have no idea the measurable capabilities of this, it could be as great or better as unrestricted Mythos, or on par with guardrailed Fable.. or just OpenAI hype that measures up to neither.

The distinction is important because if it truly is a Mythos level (or even guardrailed Fable) it in theory would require that 30 day US government validation before release as well as oversight to the approved partners allowed to use it.

Op was drawing a parallel as to why we should be outraged at the double standard, I was drawing a better parallel by which to compare.

[snewman]

Correct.