[veltas]

Surely std::print() shouldn't print anything?

[CamouflagedKiwi]

It's a typo, he describes it as std::println in the text, but the code snippet is just print()

[steeleduncan]

I think it is a typo, and should be std::println()

[nikbackm]

Why even call it in that case?

[xuhu]

It's apparently a typo in the article, they probably meant to write `println()`.

[IshKebab]

Typo in this case, but in general supporting "useless" code like this is sometimes a good idea because it makes writing generic code easier. Maybe not in this case.