|
|
|
|
|
by blini-kot
2 hours ago
|
|
apologies, not putting it directly at you I've always thought americans had an amendment specifically for situations when voting does not work I think it's a great illustration of complicated cybernetics at work, i.e. its not enough to give people the right to enact change and own the instruments for it: homeostatic forces will preserve status quo no matter how many firearms are circulating. Can't really think of a clean approach to this predicament though |
|