|
|
|
|
|
by purple-leafy
6 hours ago
|
|
I will post back with real numbers tonight, but naive approach did not compress well at all (KB easily). But of the “smart” approaches (pre compression): - 5 move motif over 2 bytes - best - 2 move motif - insanely small - 2 move motif with non linear tick delta even better - “naive” 1 byte cardinal directions (worst) - less-naive - byte relative direction changes (middle of the pack) —- But post compression with brotli the naive approach was second best and the less-naive approach was first (2-10% better than naive), I was so bummed that the better ones didn’t compress as well (about 10% worse than second best on average) |
|