[nl]

I think AI slop posts should be downvoted. I've flagged some myself.

This post didn't seem particularly AI generated to me (and notable even the OP didn't claim it was - just that they are "also prompting chat to write his posts").

It reads as someone with a moderately qualified opinion changing their mind on something and giving reasonable reasons.

The OP complaining that they "are an AI booster" and that they use AI seemed to be non-specific points rather than anything they didn't like about this post.

[noobermin]

The top comment right now is essentially explaining my issue here. My problem isn't really the pro or anti stance, this is a booster account that is farming off of the engagement. This has been a thing since musk introduced paid premium blue checks on twitter, essentially these circles of accounts that just puff each other up with AI generated posts and replies now proliferate widely. You see similar accounts like gimmick accounts, accounts that post gender war or political content, age gap discourse, whatever is currently trending or spicy in order to get engagement and thus get that small cut of premium payment for said posts. Of course, in order to get a big enough return, they use scale, and thus LLM replies and multiple accounts. The AI enthusiast circle on twitter have a similar inauthentic accounts. It wouldn't be surprising if this is just one of the person's profiles.

The thing is these are more likely than not not sincere posts but are probably bots accounts used to get some skimming amount of money from the generated content. I'd rather read actually interesting details, not the "template engagement bait" (as the top comment) posted so we can debate that instead of this contentless generated post.