[rayiner]

If you don’t have a duty to report, you don’t have a duty to report. You can’t predict what government prosecutors will do. If they start investigating and it turns out for whatever reason they can’t pin it on the boss, they could have pinned if on OP.

Think about it logically. If you’re the prosecutor, the guy whose time is fraudulent is presumptively the criminal. It could very well be that he was actually the one who was engaged in the fraud, but went to the authorities to protect himself by making it look like his boss did it.

[b40d-48b2-979e]

    If you don’t have a duty to report, you don’t have a duty to report.

This is basically saying "I have no morals of my own"

[bit-anarchist]

Having morals doesn't mean you must self-sacrifice. If you have no obligations, you have no obligations.

[b40d-48b2-979e]

He did report, he chose to report to the choice he thought would have no motion. He knew it was wrong, he consulted with what to do, then he chose the action that let him skate by while observing prison-levels of public fraud. His entire monologue is self-serving while trying to maintain a facade of responsibility/ethic.

[bit-anarchist]

What facade of reponsability? Their responsibility was not being complicit in the crime and they accomplished just that. It's not their responsibility to prosecute them, specially if it comes with significant risks to their life.