|
|
|
|
|
by freestanding
3 days ago
|
|
ye, i see.. strange choice though "lisp". i would organize memory allocator and syscalls into a separate library, like here https://codeberg.org/determin1st/sm-c-base so you kinda have libc-substitute. also your memory allocator is kinda primitive for the runtime, better to steal that one, its heap-based with groups. syscalls look almost the same, not lone enough, kek. |
|