[Morromist]

I love how this article has 3 sentences and then stops to quote the first two sentences.

Also peppered with a lot of bad, redundant writing: "That’s the shape I’m watching for. That’s the shape I think wins." - those sentences both say the same thing and you didn't need either of them.

I feel like that indicates they may not have understood HOW to write a coherent and professional article here, or, indeed, an article worth reading. They clearly understood WHY - they wanted lots of attention and to show how big of an AI booster they are but WHAT they wrote was a lot of gibberish because they didn't know HOW to write.

[gabrieledarrigo]

> AI didn’t come for a job title. AI came for a task type

I just stopped reading here. It's frustrating how so many people can't simply write an article, a document, or a ticket.

Just use your words, come on!

[wuliwong]

Also, the overuse of the term 'harness' as if it was some normal CS term we have been using to describe our systems for years was a red flag.

[g-b-r]

The how was not among the 5% of text that the agent shouldn't touch unsupervised