Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by poszlem 37 days ago
"LymeAlert seeks to help people avoid the cost and the wait of going to the emergency room after being bitten by a tick"

I might be mistaken, but I don't think you should go to the emergency room with a tick bite..? Do people really do that?
1 comments
cogman10 37 days ago
Do you need to? Probably not.

However it is somewhat area specific and Massachusetts is a hotbed when it comes to lyme disease carrying ticks. Lyme really should be treated right away.

I think urgent care wouldn't really be out of the question for a tick bite there. Telehealth is also something that likely could work here. It should be a 5 minute "Hey, got a tick bite, here's the picture of the tick, can I get a prescription for some antibiotics".

link
poszlem 36 days ago
Again, I don't think you should be given antibiotics for a tick bite, unless you start showing symptoms, namely the infamous erythema migrans? Most ticks don't carry lyme.
link
cogman10 36 days ago
It's region dependent and most people aren't commonly getting ticks in the first place.

The reason to bias towards earlier treatment is because lyme disease can potentially result in nerve damage. For something that's already uncommon (a tick bite) throwing antibiotics at it isn't a terrible thing. Especially because that's also the general treatment for a number of tick born illnesses which don't have the obvious "bullseye".

I get the "we shouldn't needlessly take antibiotics" wisdom. But that's more about common ailments and situations where they aren't needed and don't help. Like, if you have a sore throat you shouldn't immediately get antibiotics.

link