|
|
|
|
|
|
by lelanthran
3 days ago
|
|
|
> If you believe a human performs better at finding downstream effects Once gain, you are not reading what is being said - no one made that claim! No claim was made in fact: it was a refutation. Specifically, the refutation is "this is why it took so many years". |
|
|
You did not literally make that claim but your cost argument hinges on it.
Without it, then Claude does about the same as a human and only costs $100.
Apparently I'm reading your comments more thoroughly than you are.