[qarl]

Right.

And what I'm saying is I refuse to believe the Linux kernel approval procedures are that inefficient. Therefore, your belief "bottleneck was most likely not mechanical code changes" is most likely incorrect.

It would be interesting to get the actual answer to this question.

EDIT: Substantially changing your argument after posting isn't nice. But to answer your charge - no - I never made that claim.

[qustio]

Sorry, I didn't feel like this thread needed to be dragged out any longer since it's going in circles at this point and expanded my comment, but I didn't realize you had already replied.

[qarl]

Well - not really a circle. I keep saying the same thing over and over and you keep throwing arguments at it, unsuccessfully.

[NetMageSCW]

I don’t think it’s the arguments that are unsuccessful.

[qarl]

If you have an actual criticism of my argument you'll need to be more clear to be understood.