[lars_francke]

As someone working in standardization: I don't know any standardization organization where the people doing the actual work of writing standards are paid for their work. I certainly am not.

In the organizations I know - including ISO - the money is basically exclusively spent on "overhead".

[gwerbin]

Is "overhead" a euphemism for administrator salaries?

[lars_francke]

Partially. Yes. Look at the budgets of these orgs and you'll see what I mean.

I use the term similar to who it's used for non-profit. The orgs I'm involved with are almost exclusively not involved in the actual standards creation.

If the secretariats were to shut down tomorrow I'd say the actual work on the standards could continue without anyone noticing.

There is a reason that at least the EU is considering modernizing the system. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/consultations/pub...

ISO, CEN, CENELEC, ETSI are stuck very much in the past.

So yes. Overhead.

[JdeBP]

No. In such organizations the money goes towards all of the usual things such as tax, building rental, utilities, and licences, as well as employee salaries and social security contributions.

BSI Group, for example, paid 26.1% tax (25% corporation tax plus some other stuff) according to its 2025 financial statement.

In my direct experience, the people who write the standard texts get a room to sit in, power for laptops, a whiteboard, and tea/coffee and biscuits, a few days per year.

[cortesoft]

It costs money to operate a website, too.