Having spent years working for a VC and having raised rounds from VC's in Europe multiple times over the last 26 years, that it doesn't exist is news to me.
It's pennies relative to the Bay Area. E.g. London alone is the 3rd large source of VC capital by region worldwide, 1/10th of the Bay Area, but 2/3rd of New York in second place.
Every US region outside of the Bay Area is "mostly pennies" relative to the Bay Area too - the Bay Area accounts for 2/3s of the total venture capital in the US.
But that's still also somewhat misleading in that a lot of the bug US funds both have a lot of foreign LP's and invest a lot outside the US, and the same pattern holds within the US, so, sure it's pennies in terms of the location of the fund managers.
When you instead look at valuation or invested capital by recipients, it's still lopsided but much less so.
You find the same in Europe - London is far more dominant as a location of fund managers than it is as a location of LP's in the funds, as well as the location of companies invested in or valuation.
What's wrong with risk aversion? If that could prevent things like what happen in the USA currently, I would centuple down risk aversion. Europe already domestically had to suffer two world war consequences.
Yes being prudent and staying safe have costs. Acting stubbornly as base mindset all the time also have costs.